Here we go again, President Obama, our Commander in Chief of Apology for US past policies, is now telling government officials what they should say globally when commemorating the upcoming 10th anniversary of 9/11, suggesting they should tone-down references to Al Qaeda.

It is not enough that he tells us what cars we should buy, what foods we should eat and what light bulbs to burn, he now tells us what to say in order to set the tone he believes is right to commemorate and remember the victims of the Jihad attack by radical Islam terrorists called Al Qaeda, on 9/11 that took nearly 3,000 lives.

He wants government officials both home and abroad to tone down the references to Al Qaeda, ergo referencing Jihad, Muslims and terrorists.

Obama not only wants to tell us what to say, in order to control the thinking and behavioral process on a global basis, he wants to write history.

This would be analogous to us not remembering that on December 7, 1941 the Japanese (Japs) attacked Pearl Harbor, killing more than 2000 members of our military, and sinking and damaging Naval ships as they lie in harbor.   Or, that Nazi Germany, under the maniacal dictatorship of Adolph Hitler,  committed one of the most depraved  acts against humanity by slaughtering some 6 million Jews.

We never forgot those victims nor those that committed the acts anymore than we should forget the victims of 9/11 or those that committed the acts of terror and praised Ali while so doing.  The terrorists were practicing Muslm’s from Pakistan training and given safe harbor in Afghanistan.

It was disclosed today by the New York Times that the Obama administration had lengthy internal discussions on how to commemorate 9/11.  The end result were two sets of guidelines on how to unify the message for public  events and official statement. Another set of guidelines that all federal agencies received, emphasized what steps have been taken to prevent another 9/11 style attack in the US and encourages citizens to volunteer.

The guidelines detail what the White House has deemed the important themes that must be discussed, as well as the tone the 9/11 observances should take.  It stresses the word resilience and suggests it as the theme for the commemoration.

The documents state that Osama bin Laden’s death is a reason for officials to “minimize references to Al Qaeda.”

It says, “Al Qaeda and its adherents have become increasingly irrelevant, ” and to reference the lack of any major role Al Qaeda played in the Arab Spring.  Al Qaeda “represents the past,” the guidelines state, while peaceful protests in Arab countries “represent the future.”

The documents as reported in the New York Times states: “As we commemorate the citizens of over 90 countries who perished in the 9/11 attacks, we honor all victims of terrorism, in every nation around the world,”the foreign guidelines state.  “We honor and celebrate the resilience of individuals, families and communities on every continent, whether in New York or Nairobi, Bali or Belfast, Mumbai or Manila, or Lahore or London.”

Well that touches all the bases.  However in the process should we be blurring the message of 9/11.  This is the anniversary of the most devastating attack on the United States by terrorists that represent a religion in Arab states – Islam.

The guidelines suggests the strong influence of Barack Hussein Obama, and the influence on him by his Muslim father, which he cites in his book, “Aduaacity Of Hope”, and the environment in which he grew up.

The guidelines also emphasize the theme resilience, “Resilience takes many forms, including the dedication and courage to move forward.  While we must never forget those who we lost, we must do more than simply remember them – we must sustain our resilience and remain united to prevent new attacks and new victims.”

This is nothing more than a call for appeasement, amelioration for the Muslims that attacked us, and doing so with mealy mouthed insipid words and rhetoric that will be seen for what it is by the audience, all coming from the US Commander in Chief of Apology delivering another failed policy which will be looked upon by our enemies with disdain and a lack of respect.