President Obama is in a state of denial of reality.

America sent a strong signal to Obama in the dramatic loss of House candidates in the Congress, the likes of which we haven’t seen since 1932.  In addition he lost 6 seats in the Senate.

He says the loss was a communication problem.  This coming from an orator, a president that has proven to handle a teleprompter -  if it doesn’t fall down – better than most TV anchors.

He refuses to recognize that the people have repudiated his liberal policies.

He would rather believe it was the economy, an economy he inherited from the Bush administration.

I guess it is a common frailty  to rationalize away errors with excuses, rather than admit to  a policy of spending, big government and ideology.

Obama doesn’t understand fiscal responsibility, nor does he want to – it is the premise of big government, possibly with an intent to create a new world order.

He is a president of left wing class warfare – redistribution of wealth is his primary focus.

He refers to Republicans as ‘enemies’ who should ‘sit in the back’, a rather arrogant comment prior to the election, but following the election, admitting that his party took a ‘shellacking’, but  said the loss had to do with the economy and jobs which should have been the focal point from the outset.  However, instead he focused on a stimulus program that didn’t work, cap and trade that was rejected, and rammed down the people’s throat a health care program they didn’t want.

Well, he sure as hell got out of town fast after the defeat, on an extravagant, extraordinary security structured trip, with an entourage that only Pharaohs and Kings took in ancient history.  But the Pentagon and the White House denies the reports from India as to what is actually taking place.  Will we ever know as taxpayers what the actual cost was – and shouldn’t we?  Will we ever know the cost benefit ratio of such a trip, or the results it produced?  Or is that transparency, something Obama promised but didn’t deliver?

This president doesn’t seem to have a respect for the office he holds nor the people he represents, or for that matter America and its significant history of coming to the aide of the world in war and peace?

When he travels to foreign lands he panders to his audience.  Perhaps this is what he did with the American people to get elected?

Does he have a respect for the office he holds?  We the people only allow individuals to hold that position for two four year terms at the most and a message was sent to him in his first two years in office.

Yes, he has served only two years and he has been resoundingly repudiated.

Does he represent America, the Constitution or we the people?

This is a serious question on the basis of his left wing policies and the way in which he represents America when he goes abroad.

In India at St. Xavier College in Mumbai he responded to a question about his views of jihad by saying that the term has a lot of meanings within Islam, but the overwhelming majority of the more than 1 billion Muslims in the world, see their religion as one that reaffirms “peace and justice and fairness and tolerance,” according to Fox News.

He was very careful in his comments and slow in his delivery in response to the question.  But nevertheless he went on to say, “I think all of us recognize that this great religion in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence towards innocent people that is never justified,” Obama said, adding that Islam is one of the world’s great religions and people of all faiths need to treat one another with respect and mutual dignity.

Obviously the reaction won favorable responses from leading Muslims in India, where Islam is the second largest religion with more than 160 Muuslims.

Is this but another example now of selective political denial of reality and part of an ideology of world order?

Did he forget that 3,000 people were killed in America on 9/11 by Muslims?  Did he forget that since then the terrorist attacks on the United States and elsewhere, that in some cases were thwarted, involved Muslims?

Yet he calls those Musulims “a few extremists”.  He even goes to the extent of calling them “extremists” not “terrorists”.  How ‘few’ does it take to make ‘many?’  How ‘many’ does it take to make ‘war?’

The electorate in the United States is not stupid.  The rejection that just took place here was a clear recognition that Obama’s policies are a radical lurch to the left.

When he returns to the United States the question will be whether he will move in a bipartisan way to the center, which the electorate clearly sent a message for, to work with the Republican controlled House, or damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead with radical left wing policies, pandering to Muslims and world order?

The bell-weather decision for Obama will not be complicated.  It has to be a continuation of the Bush tax cuts for all, that will result in big and small business spending and a return to jobs, the fiscal responsibility of reducing the debt, repealing or modifying health care, honoring the Constitution, enforcing immigration laws as they were written, and upholding America as a free enterprise capitalist system that it was created to be.