The 21st century version of Bonnie & Clyde is alive and well and operating today under the nom de plume of Hillary & Bill Clinton.

Today after a marginal victory in the Pennsylvania primary where she picked up 10 delegates — an inconclusive result — Hillary said, “I’m very proud that, as of today, I have received more votes by the people who have voted than anybody else.” She urged the crowd to whom she was speaking to contribute to her campaign, noting that Obama outspent her in Pennsylvania by as much as 3 1/2 to 1.

That figure on spending is inaccurate — Obama outspent her 2 to 1.

Her claim that she has received more votes by the people than anyone else is also inaccurate, Obama has the popular vote as well as the delegate vote and the Clinton calculus is more like a Bonnie & Clyde attempted heist. Hillary wants votes in Michigan, where Obama’s name wasn’t on the ballot, and in Florida to count when her own party disenfranchised both states for not following Party rules in scheduling primaries.

Enough has been said about Hillary’s landing in Bosnia with Chelsea under fire while a small child was reading a poem to both. It just didn’t happen and the media has video to prove it and she herself admitted it was a falsehood.

It is a fantasy campaign trumped up by two disingenuous individuals trying to steel an election from the first black man who has ever found himself in this position.

It somehow appears to be in the Clinton genes, that is, not being trustworthy.

Only yesterday Bill Clinton took words that he said and tried to claim that the Obama campaign played the “race card on me.”

And then when a reporter challenged him with what he said which he had on tape, the former President became irritated.

The facts are that on WHYY radio a reporter noted to Bill Clinton that some African-American officials in Philadelphia switched their early support from his wife to Senator Obama after Clinton compared Obama’s win in South Carolina to that of Jesse Jackson’s.

The reporter asked Clinton, Do you think that was a mistake and would you do that again?”

Clinton said, “No, I think that they played the race card on me. We now know, from memos from the campaign and everything that they planned to do it along.”

And then Bill delivered a disjointed explanation that defies the actual tape of what he said. Is it any wonder that Hillary in polls has the lowest score among the public in general when it comes to being trustworthy?

The Democrats own mouthpiece the New York Times in an editorial today entitled “The Low Road To Victory” said “It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.”

The Times came to the conclusion, that it was “time for the superdelegates to do what the Democrats had in mind when they created superdelegates: settle a bloody race that cannot be won at the ballot box. Mrs. Clinton once had a big lead among the party elders, but has been steadily losing it, in large part because of her negative campaign. If she is ever to have a hope of persuading these most loyal of Democrats to come back to her side, let alone win over the larger body of voters, she has to call off the dogs.”

The Times is obviously leaning toward the more liberal of the two candidates, even though they do make valid points about Hillary’s negative campaign. But as history has demonstrated Hillary & Bill are not going to back off any more than Bonnie & Clyde did — if you recall they went down in a barrage of bullets.